MergeShieldDemo
Like what you see? Sign up with GitHub to start governing your own repos — free forever.
Back to Pull Requests
Implement user role permissions
55/100 High
55/100 High
Risk analysis complete.Score: 55/100
GitHub
Summary
RBAC implementation across API — moderate risk from middleware changes affecting all routes.
Model: claude-sonnet-4-20250514Duration: 13200msTokens: 4600
Was this analysis helpful?
Risk Scores
Overall55/100
Complexity50/100
Security65/100
Blast Radius60/100
Test Coverage45/100
Breaking Change40/100
File-Level Risk
| File | Risk | Category | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
src/middleware/rbac.ts | 65 | security | Core RBAC middleware with permission checking logic |
src/models/user-roles.ts | 55 | breaking Change | New roles schema with migration |
src/routes/admin.ts | 50 | security | Admin-only routes with role escalation prevention |
src/middleware/auth.ts | 45 | blast Radius | Auth middleware now chains with RBAC checks |
security
65/100Findings
- • Role-based access control with 4 permission levels (admin, owner, member, viewer)
- • Permission checks added to 12 API routes via middleware
- • Role escalation prevention: users cannot assign higher roles than their own
Suggestions
- → Add audit logging for all permission changes
- → Consider row-level security for database queries as defense in depth
blast Radius
60/100Findings
- • Middleware change affects all 12 protected API routes
- • Database schema adds roles column with NOT NULL constraint
- • Existing users default to 'member' role — may need admin bootstrap
Suggestions
- → Add migration script to set initial admin users
- → Feature flag for gradual rollout of permission enforcement
complexity
50/100Findings
- • Permission hierarchy with inheritance (admin inherits owner permissions)
- • Composable middleware pattern for flexible permission combinations
- • 18 files changed but well-organized by feature
Suggestions
- → Extract permission constants into shared enum for consistency